You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variations in the Human Pain Stress Experience Mediated by Ventral and Dorsal Basal Ganglia Dopamine Activity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.2577-06.2006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David J. Scott, Mary M. Heitzeg, Robert A. Koeppe, Christian S. Stohler, Jon-Kar Zubieta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 248 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 51 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 19% |
Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
Other | 57 | 22% |
Unknown | 33 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 50 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 45 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 15% |
Chemistry | 6 | 2% |
Other | 29 | 11% |
Unknown | 52 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,669,299
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#7,242
of 24,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,737
of 87,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#46
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.