↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy: molecular mechanisms, physiological functions and relevance in human pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Autophagy: molecular mechanisms, physiological functions and relevance in human pathology
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00018-004-4012-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Mariño, C. López-Otín

Abstract

Autophagy is a degradative mechanism mainly involved in the recycling and turnover of cytoplasmic constituents from eukaryotic cells. Over the last years, yeast genetic screens have considerably increased our knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of autophagy, and a number of genes involved in fundamental steps of the autophagic pathway have been identified. Most of these autophagy genes are present in higher eukaryotes indicating that this process has been evolutionarily conserved. In yeast, autophagy is mainly involved in adaptation to starvation, but in multicellular organisms this route has emerged as a multifunctional pathway involved in a variety of additional processes such as programmed cell death, removal of damaged organelles and development of different tissue-specific functions. Furthermore, autophagy is associated with a growing number of pathological conditions, including cancer, myopathies and neurodegenerative disorders. The physiological and pathological roles of autophagy, as well as the molecular mechanisms underlying this multifunctional pathway, are discussed in this review.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 4 2%
Chile 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 160 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,940,289
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#714
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,123
of 58,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.