| Title |
ChIP-seq: Using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein–DNA interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 916 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 862 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 241 | 26% |
| Researcher | 198 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 112 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 3% |
| Other | 117 | 13% |
| Unknown | 124 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 408 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 243 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 5% |
| Unknown | 140 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,670,637
of 30,143,106 outputs
Outputs from Methods
#27
of 2,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,369
of 124,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,143,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.