↓ Skip to main content

Defining the Differences Between Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 919)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Defining the Differences Between Episodic Migraine and Chronic Migraine
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11916-011-0233-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zaza Katsarava, Dawn C. Buse, Aubrey N. Manack, Richard B. Lipton

Abstract

Chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) are part of the spectrum of migraine disorders, but they are distinct clinical entities. Population-based studies have shown that those with CM demonstrate higher individual and societal burden because they are significantly more disabled than those with EM and have greater impaired quality of life both inside and outside the home. Proper diagnosis of both conditions requires clearly defined clinical criteria. Diagnosis enables the initiation of appropriate treatments and risk-factor modification, which ultimately improve functional status and quality of life for persons with migraine. Recognizing that both disorders are on the spectrum of migraine, this review serves as a guide to define the disease state of CM as distinct from EM in terms of clinical, epidemiological, sociodemographic, and comorbidity profiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 321 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 15%
Researcher 47 14%
Other 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 10%
Student > Master 32 10%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 90 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 6%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 103 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 372. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#85,691
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#1
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252
of 155,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them