↓ Skip to main content

Archaeal and bacterial diversity in two hot spring microbial mats from a geothermal region in Romania

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Archaeal and bacterial diversity in two hot spring microbial mats from a geothermal region in Romania
Published in
Extremophiles, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00792-013-0537-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristian Coman, Bogdan Drugă, Adriana Hegedus, Cosmin Sicora, Nicolae Dragoş

Abstract

The diversity of archaea and bacteria was investigated in two slightly alkaline, mesophilic hot springs from the Western Plain of Romania. Phylogenetic analysis showed a low diversity of Archaea, only three Euryarchaeota taxa being detected: Methanomethylovorans thermophila, Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis and Methanococcus aeolicus. Twelve major bacterial groups were identified, both springs being dominated by Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria. While at the phylum/class-level the microbial mats share a similar biodiversity; at the species level the geothermal springs investigated seem to be colonized by specific consortia. The dominant taxa were filamentous heterocyst-containing Fischerella, at 45 °C and non-heterocyst Leptolyngbya and Geitlerinema, at 55 °C. Other bacterial taxa (Thauera sp., Methyloversatilis universalis, Pannonibacter phragmitetus, Polymorphum gilvum, Metallibacterium sp. and Spartobacteria) were observed for the first time in association with a geothermal habitat. Based on their bacterial diversity the two mats were clustered together with other similar habitats from Europe and part of Asia, most likely the water temperature playing a major role in the formation of specific microbial communities that colonize the investigated thermal springs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,391,543
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#198
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,488
of 199,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.