You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estrogen-Dependent Signaling in a Molecularly Distinct Subclass of Aggressive Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djn150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sunita R. Setlur, Kirsten D. Mertz, Yujin Hoshida, Francesca Demichelis, Mathieu Lupien, Sven Perner, Andrea Sboner, Yudi Pawitan, Ove Andrén, Laura A. Johnson, Jeff Tang, Hans-Olov Adami, Stefano Calza, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Daniel Rhodes, Scott Tomlins, Katja Fall, Lorelei A. Mucci, Philip W. Kantoff, Meir J. Stampfer, Swen-Olof Andersson, Eberhard Varenhorst, Jan-Erik Johansson, Myles Brown, Todd R. Golub, Mark A. Rubin |
| Abstract |
The majority of prostate cancers harbor gene fusions of the 5'-untranslated region of the androgen-regulated transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) promoter with erythroblast transformation-specific transcription factor family members. The common fusion between TMPRESS2 and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) (ERG) is associated with a more aggressive clinical phenotype, implying the existence of a distinct subclass of prostate cancer defined by this fusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 20% |
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,569,116
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#997
of 7,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,833
of 98,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.