| Title |
Estrogen receptor preparation effects on the receptor–DNA interaction by surface plasmon resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-016-9967-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandrine Bayle, Joel Chopineau, Benoit Roig, Denis Habauzit |
| Abstract |
Up to now, several studies have investigated estrogen receptor (ER)-estrogen response element (ERE) interaction using biosensors such as surface plasmon resonance. These strategies have aimed to understand the molecular mechanism of such interaction as well as the effect of the ligand on this interaction. These approaches start to be used to determine the mechanisms of protein/DNA interaction, in particular in the context of drug discovery or environmental applications. However, some physical and biochemical parameters (incubation time, temperature, protease inhibitor cocktail, and bovine serum albumin (BSA)) are not completely described in the literature and could deeply modify the obtained results. This paper aims to focus not only on the preliminary steps of sample preparation such as protein thawing and incubation conditions (time and temperature) but also on the evaluation of protease inhibitor cocktail and BSA effect on the measurement of ER-ERE interactions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 33% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,570
of 9,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,949
of 328,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#108
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.