↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity and endometrial cancer risk: a review of the current evidence, biologic mechanisms and the quality of physical activity assessment methods

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity and endometrial cancer risk: a review of the current evidence, biologic mechanisms and the quality of physical activity assessment methods
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10552-006-0094-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne E. Cust, Bruce K. Armstrong, Christine M. Friedenreich, Nadia Slimani, Adrian Bauman

Abstract

To (1) determine the nature of the association between physical activity and endometrial cancer risk; (2) assess the contribution of variation in the quality of physical activity measurement to inconsistencies in study results; and (3) review the biologic mechanisms that might mediate possible effects of physical activity on risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 10 16%
Unspecified 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Unspecified 7 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2010.
All research outputs
#3,978,416
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#450
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,818
of 162,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.