↓ Skip to main content

A Systems Biology-Based Gene Expression Classifier of Glioblastoma Predicts Survival with Solid Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systems Biology-Based Gene Expression Classifier of Glioblastoma Predicts Survival with Solid Tumors
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhang, Bing Liu, Xingpeng Jiang, Huizhi Zhao, Ming Fan, Zhenjie Fan, J. Jack Lee, Tao Jiang, Tianzi Jiang, Sonya Wei Song

Abstract

Accurate prediction of survival of cancer patients is still a key open problem in clinical research. Recently, many large-scale gene expression clusterings have identified sets of genes reportedly predictive of prognosis; however, those gene sets shared few genes in common and were poorly validated using independent data. We have developed a systems biology-based approach by using either combined gene sets and the protein interaction network (Method A) or the protein network alone (Method B) to identify common prognostic genes based on microarray gene expression data of glioblastoma multiforme and compared with differential gene expression clustering (Method C). Validations of prediction performance show that the 23-prognostic gene classifier identified by Method A outperforms other gene classifiers identified by Methods B and C or previously reported for gliomas on 17 of 20 independent sample cohorts across five tumor types. We also find that among the 23 genes are 21 related to cellular proliferation and two related to response to stress/immune response. We further find that the increased expression of the 21 genes and the decreased expression of the other two genes are associated with poorer survival, which is supportive with the notion that cellular proliferation and immune response contribute to a significant portion of predictive power of prognostic classifiers. Our results demonstrate that the systems biology-based approach enables to identify common survival-associated genes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
Brazil 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Tunisia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Professor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Mathematics 4 7%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,674,355
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,202
of 193,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,722
of 95,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#106
of 509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.