| Title |
Metabolic Effects of Weight Loss on a Very-Low-Carbohydrate Diet Compared With an Isocaloric High-Carbohydrate Diet in Abdominally Obese Subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeannie Tay, Grant D. Brinkworth, Manny Noakes, Jennifer Keogh, Peter M. Clifton |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to compare the effects of an energy-reduced, isocaloric very-low-carbohydrate, high-fat (VLCHF) diet and a high-carbohydrate, low-fat (HCLF) diet on weight loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#309,285
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#708
of 16,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#669
of 169,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.