| Title |
Fine-tuning banana Xanthomonas wilt control options over the past decade in East and Central Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-014-0402-0 |
| Authors |
Guy Blomme, Kim Jacobsen, Walter Ocimati, Fen Beed, Jules Ntamwira, Charles Sivirihauma, Fred Ssekiwoko, Valentine Nakato, Jerome Kubiriba, Leena Tripathi, William Tinzaara, Flory Mbolela, Lambert Lutete, Eldad Karamura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#317
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,739
of 221,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.