| Title |
Computerized Provider Order Entry Adoption: Implications for Clinical Workflow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-008-0857-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily M. Campbell, Kenneth P. Guappone, Dean F. Sittig, Richard H. Dykstra, Joan S. Ash |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 24% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 46% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,839,484
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,786
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,295
of 171,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.