You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accurate phylogenetic classification of variable-length DNA fragments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth976 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Carolyn McHardy, Héctor García Martín, Aristotelis Tsirigos, Philip Hugenholtz, Isidore Rigoutsos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 600 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 6% |
| Brazil | 7 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 3% |
| Unknown | 515 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 27% |
| Researcher | 156 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 321 | 54% |
| Computer Science | 69 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,926,604
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,174
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,663
of 174,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.