Title |
Generation of cyanogen-free transgenic cassava
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta, March 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00425-003-1005-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dimuth Siritunga, Richard T. Sayre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
Colombia | 3 | 1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 190 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 47 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 19% |
Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 4% |
Other | 31 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 116 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 10% |
Engineering | 9 | 4% |
Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,981,008
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#46
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 71,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.