You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced elimination in acute barbiturate poisoning – A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3109/15563650.2010.550582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren M. Roberts, Nick A. Buckley |
| Abstract |
Despite a worldwide decline in barbiturate use, cases of acute poisoning with severe toxicity are still noted, particularly in developing countries. Severe poisonings often require prolonged admission to an intensive care unit, so enhanced elimination might be useful to hasten recovery. Information regarding the efficacy of these techniques for individual barbiturates is not available in standard textbooks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Peru | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 52% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,910,869
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#314
of 2,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,248
of 193,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.