| Title |
History of robotic surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Robotic Surgery, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satyam Kalan, Sanket Chauhan, Rafael F. Coelho, Marcelo A. Orvieto, Ignacio R. Camacho, Kenneth J. Palmer, Vipul R. Patel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 23% |
| Engineering | 35 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,492,173
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#200
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,792
of 94,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.