↓ Skip to main content

cPAS-based sequencing on the BGISEQ-500 to explore small non-coding RNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
cPAS-based sequencing on the BGISEQ-500 to explore small non-coding RNAs
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13148-016-0287-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Fehlmann, Stefanie Reinheimer, Chunyu Geng, Xiaoshan Su, Snezana Drmanac, Andrei Alexeev, Chunyan Zhang, Christina Backes, Nicole Ludwig, Martin Hart, Dan An, Zhenzhen Zhu, Chongjun Xu, Ao Chen, Ming Ni, Jian Liu, Yuxiang Li, Matthew Poulter, Yongping Li, Cord Stähler, Radoje Drmanac, Xun Xu, Eckart Meese, Andreas Keller

Abstract

We present the first sequencing data using the combinatorial probe-anchor synthesis (cPAS)-based BGISEQ-500 sequencer. Applying cPAS, we investigated the repertoire of human small non-coding RNAs and compared it to other techniques. Starting with repeated measurements of different specimens including solid tissues (brain and heart) and blood, we generated a median of 30.1 million reads per sample. 24.1 million mapped to the human genome and 23.3 million to the miRBase. Among six technical replicates of brain samples, we observed a median correlation of 0.98. Comparing BGISEQ-500 to HiSeq, we calculated a correlation of 0.75. The comparability to microarrays was similar for both BGISEQ-500 and HiSeq with the first one showing a correlation of 0.58 and the latter one correlation of 0.6. As for a potential bias in the detected expression distribution in blood cells, 98.6% of HiSeq reads versus 93.1% of BGISEQ-500 reads match to the 10 miRNAs with highest read count. After using miRDeep2 and employing stringent selection criteria for predicting new miRNAs, we detected 74 high-likely candidates in the cPAS sequencing reads prevalent in solid tissues and 36 candidates prevalent in blood. While there is apparently no ideal platform for all challenges of miRNome analyses, cPAS shows high technical reproducibility and supplements the hitherto available platforms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,401,029
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#72
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,334
of 417,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.