↓ Skip to main content

Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
118 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
949 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1075 Mendeley
Title
Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth N. Chapman, Anna Kaatz, Molly Carnes

Abstract

Although the medical profession strives for equal treatment of all patients, disparities in health care are prevalent. Cultural stereotypes may not be consciously endorsed, but their mere existence influences how information about an individual is processed and leads to unintended biases in decision-making, so called "implicit bias". All of society is susceptible to these biases, including physicians. Research suggests that implicit bias may contribute to health care disparities by shaping physician behavior and producing differences in medical treatment along the lines of race, ethnicity, gender or other characteristics. We review the origins of implicit bias, cite research documenting the existence of implicit bias among physicians, and describe studies that demonstrate implicit bias in clinical decision-making. We then present the bias-reducing strategies of consciously taking patients' perspectives and intentionally focusing on individual patients' information apart from their social group. We conclude that the contribution of implicit bias to health care disparities could decrease if all physicians acknowledged their susceptibility to it, and deliberately practiced perspective-taking and individuation when providing patient care. We further conclude that increasing the number of African American/Black physicians could reduce the impact of implicit bias on health care disparities because they exhibit significantly less implicit race bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,075 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 1065 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 141 13%
Student > Master 123 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 117 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 10%
Researcher 92 9%
Other 217 20%
Unknown 275 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 284 26%
Psychology 113 11%
Social Sciences 103 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 93 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 3%
Other 136 13%
Unknown 318 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 363. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#89,126
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#90
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#522
of 213,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.