You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon dioxide fluxes reflect plant zonation and belowground biomass in a coastal marsh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosphere, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecs2.1560 |
| Authors |
Serena Moseman‐Valtierra, Omar I. Abdul‐Aziz, Jianwu Tang, Khandker S. Ishtiaq, Kate Morkeski, Jordan Mora, Ryan K. Quinn, Rose M. Martin, Katharine Egan, Elizabeth Q. Brannon, Joanna Carey, Kevin D. Kroeger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 44 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#2,817
of 3,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,268
of 311,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#104
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.