↓ Skip to main content

Forgotten antibiotics: a follow-up inventory study in Europe, the USA, Canada and Australia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 3,073)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forgotten antibiotics: a follow-up inventory study in Europe, the USA, Canada and Australia
Published in
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.09.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Céline Pulcini, Simone Mohrs, Bojana Beovic, Inge Gyssens, Ursula Theuretzbacher, Otto Cars, ReAct Working Group on Old Antibiotics the ESCMID Study Group for Antibiotic Policies, Bojana Beovic, Golubinka Bosevska, Marcel Bruch, Karen Bush, Otto Cars, Lidija Cizmovic, Nick Daneman, Béatrice Demoré, Aleksander Deptuła, Uga Dumpis, Aoife Fleming, Niels Frimodt-Mǿller, Helen Giamarellou, Ljiljana Gojkovic-Bukarica, Thorolfur Gudnason, Inge Gyssens, Hakan Hanberger, Stephan Harbarth, Arjan Harxhi, Todor Kantardjiev, Doubravka Kostalova, Vladimir Krcmery, Katrin Kurvits, Endre Ludwig, Outi Lyytikäinen, Alasdair MacGowan, Simone Mohrs, Síle O'Connor, Leonardo Pagani, George L. Petrikkos, Gabriel Adrian Popescu, Céline Pulcini, Lul Raka, José Ramón Paño Pardo, Liliana Cristina Ramos Dias, Hege Salvesen-Blix, Gunnar Skov Simonsen, Evelina Tacconelli, Ursula Theuretzbacher, John Turnidge, Rolanda Valintėlienė, Vera Vlahović-Palčevski, Peter Zarb, Helena Zemlickova

Abstract

The objective of this study was to update a 2011 survey, conducted on behalf of the ESCMID Study Group for Antibiotic Policies (ESGAP), studying the availability of old but clinically useful antibiotics in North America, Europe and Australia. This follow-up survey was performed in 2015 in 40 countries among specialists from the pharmaceutical, infectious diseases and microbiology sectors in North America, Europe and Australia in order to assess the availability through usual marketing processes of 36 systemic antibiotics (addition of 3 antibiotics compared with the 2011 survey) selected for their ability to treat infections caused by resistant bacteria and their unique value for specific criteria. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail to national contacts belonging to ESGAP and ReAct networks. In all, 39 of the 40 countries participated in this survey. The number of available antibiotics differed considerably from one drug to another as well as from one country to another (e.g. 7 antibiotics available in Estonia, 24 in France). Overall, 25/36 selected antibiotics were marketed in 20/39 countries or less. From 2011 to 2015 (data available for both periods in 37 countries for 33 antibiotics), the number of available selected antibiotics increased in 13 countries and decreased in 17. In conclusion, despite the ongoing bacterial resistance crisis, the situation regarding the availability of 'forgotten antibiotics' has worsened since 2011. Urgent measures are needed to ensure better availability of these antibiotics on a global scale as a conservation measure to ensure sustainable and responsible use of antibiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#492,474
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#46
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,755
of 292,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.