| Title |
Comparative Genome Analysis of Prevotella ruminicola and Prevotella bryantii: Insights into Their Environmental Niche
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Ecology, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00248-010-9692-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janaki Purushe, Derrick E. Fouts, Mark Morrison, Bryan A. White, Roderick I. Mackie, the North American Consortium for Rumen Bacteria, Pedro M. Coutinho, Bernard Henrissat, Karen E. Nelson |
| Abstract |
The Prevotellas comprise a diverse group of bacteria that has received surprisingly limited attention at the whole genome-sequencing level. In this communication, we present the comparative analysis of the genomes of Prevotella ruminicola 23 (GenBank: CP002006) and Prevotella bryantii B(1)4 (GenBank: ADWO00000000), two gastrointestinal isolates. Both P. ruminicola and P. bryantii have acquired an extensive repertoire of glycoside hydrolases that are targeted towards non-cellulosic polysaccharides, especially GH43 bifunctional enzymes. Our analysis demonstrates the diversity of this genus. The results from these analyses highlight their role in the gastrointestinal tract, and provide a template for additional work on genetic characterization of these species. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 26% |
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,640,933
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#67
of 2,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,532
of 94,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.