↓ Skip to main content

Bear-inflicted injuries: report of 4 cases

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 281)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2123 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bear-inflicted injuries: report of 4 cases
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2011
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.22.229
Authors

Masayasu Kato, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Masato Maeda, Kenichi Ando, Keiji Suga, Tsutomu Imai, Takashi Shiroko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 790. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#24,587
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#1
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60
of 192,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them