↓ Skip to main content

Action understanding and active inference

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
511 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Action understanding and active inference
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00422-011-0424-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl Friston, Jérémie Mattout, James Kilner

Abstract

We have suggested that the mirror-neuron system might be usefully understood as implementing Bayes-optimal perception of actions emitted by oneself or others. To substantiate this claim, we present neuronal simulations that show the same representations can prescribe motor behavior and encode motor intentions during action-observation. These simulations are based on the free-energy formulation of active inference, which is formally related to predictive coding. In this scheme, (generalised) states of the world are represented as trajectories. When these states include motor trajectories they implicitly entail intentions (future motor states). Optimizing the representation of these intentions enables predictive coding in a prospective sense. Crucially, the same generative models used to make predictions can be deployed to predict the actions of self or others by simply changing the bias or precision (i.e. attention) afforded to proprioceptive signals. We illustrate these points using simulations of handwriting to illustrate neuronally plausible generation and recognition of itinerant (wandering) motor trajectories. We then use the same simulations to produce synthetic electrophysiological responses to violations of intentional expectations. Our results affirm that a Bayes-optimal approach provides a principled framework, which accommodates current thinking about the mirror-neuron system. Furthermore, it endorses the general formulation of action as active inference.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 645 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 25%
Researcher 125 18%
Student > Master 84 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 7%
Professor 42 6%
Other 125 18%
Unknown 100 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 182 26%
Neuroscience 102 15%
Computer Science 74 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 7%
Engineering 45 6%
Other 101 14%
Unknown 146 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,634,382
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#89
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,177
of 110,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.