You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of weight change and weight cycling on risk of different subtypes of endometrial cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C.M. Nagle, L. Marquart, C.J. Bain, S. O’Brien, P.H. Lahmann, M. Quinn, M.K. Oehler, A. Obermair, A.B. Spurdle, P.M. Webb, Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group |
| Abstract |
Obesity is an established risk factor for endometrial cancer. Associations tend to be stronger for the endometrioid subtype. The role of adult weight change and weight cycling is uncertain. Our study aimed to determine whether there is an association between different adult weight trajectories, weight cycling and risk of endometrial cancer overall, and by subtype. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#5,080
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,005
of 212,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#38
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.