You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the methodologies used to evaluate telemedicine service initiatives in hospital facilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Medical Informatics, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharifah AlDossary, Melinda G. Martin-Khan, Natalie K. Bradford, Anthony C. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 50% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 6% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 97 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,148,562
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#198
of 1,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,524
of 327,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.