↓ Skip to main content

Using InSAR to detect subsidence at brine wells, sinkhole sites, and mines

Overview of attention for article published in Carbonates and Evaporites, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 212)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Using InSAR to detect subsidence at brine wells, sinkhole sites, and mines
Published in
Carbonates and Evaporites, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13146-013-0134-9
Authors

Michael L. Rucker, Bibhuti B. Panda, Robert A. Meyers, John C. Lommler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 34%
Engineering 5 17%
Computer Science 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#4,485,112
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Carbonates and Evaporites
#6
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,979
of 196,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbonates and Evaporites
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them