↓ Skip to main content

Social referencing in dog-owner dyads?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Social referencing in dog-owner dyads?
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10071-011-0443-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Merola, E. Prato-Previde, S. Marshall-Pescini

Abstract

Social referencing is the seeking of information from another individual to form one's own understanding and guide action. In this study, adult dogs were tested in a social referencing paradigm involving their owner and a potentially scary object. Dogs received either a positive or negative message from the owner. The aim was to evaluate the presence of referential looking to the owner, behavioural regulation based on the owner's (vocal and facial) emotional message and observational conditioning following the owner's actions towards the object. Most dogs (83%) looked referentially to the owner after looking at the strange object, thus they appear to seek information about the environment from the human, but little differences were found between dogs in the positive and negative groups as regards behavioural regulation: possible explanations for this are discussed. Finally, a strong effect of observational conditioning was found with dogs in the positive group moving closer to the fan and dogs in the negative group moving away, both mirroring their owner's behaviour. Results are discussed in relation to studies on human-dog communication, attachment and social learning.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 28 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 31%
Psychology 48 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 8%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,771,550
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#412
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,655
of 124,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.