↓ Skip to main content

Minicolumnar abnormalities in autism

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
418 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
Minicolumnar abnormalities in autism
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00401-006-0085-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel F. Casanova, Imke A. J. van Kooten, Andrew E. Switala, Herman van Engeland, Helmut Heinsen, Harry W. M. Steinbusch, Patrick R. Hof, Juan Trippe, Janet Stone, Christoph Schmitz

Abstract

Autism is characterized by qualitative abnormalities in behavior and higher order cognitive functions. Minicolumnar irregularities observed in autism provide a neurologically sound localization to observed clinical and anatomical abnormalities. This study corroborates the initial reports of a minicolumnopathy in autism within an independent sample. The patient population consisted of six age-matched pairs of patients (DSM-IV-TR and ADI-R diagnosed) and controls. Digital micrographs were taken from cortical areas S1, 4, 9, and 17. The image analysis produced estimates of minicolumnar width (CW), mean interneuronal distance, variability in CW (V (CW)), cross section of Nissl-stained somata, boundary length of stained somata per unit area, and the planar convexity. On average CW was 27.2 microm in controls and 25.7 microm in autistic patients (P = 0.0234). Mean neuron and nucleolar cross sections were found to be smaller in autistic cases compared to controls, while neuron density in autism exceeded the comparison group by 23%. Analysis of inter- and intracluster distances of a Delaunay triangulation suggests that the increased cell density is the result of a greater number of minicolumns, otherwise the number of cells per minicolumns appears normal. A reduction in both somatic and nucleolar cross sections could reflect a bias towards shorter connecting fibers, which favors local computation at the expense of inter-areal and callosal connectivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 341 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 65 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 19%
Neuroscience 60 17%
Psychology 59 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 87 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,940,318
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#440
of 2,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,507
of 65,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.