↓ Skip to main content

Remote ischemic preconditioning confers late protection against myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury in mice by upregulating interleukin-10

Overview of attention for article published in Basic Research in Cardiology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Remote ischemic preconditioning confers late protection against myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury in mice by upregulating interleukin-10
Published in
Basic Research in Cardiology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00395-012-0277-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheqing P. Cai, Nirmal Parajuli, Xiaoxu Zheng, Lewis Becker

Abstract

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) induces a prolonged late phase of multi-organ protection against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that RIPC confers late protection against myocardial IR injury by upregulating expression of interleukin (IL)-10. Mice were exposed to lower limb RIPC or sham ischemia. After 24 h, mice with RIPC demonstrated decreased myocardial infarct size and improved cardiac contractility following 30-min ischemia and 120-min reperfusion (I-30/R-120). These effects of RIPC were completely blocked by anti-IL-10 receptor antibodies. In IL-10 knockout mice, RIPC cardioprotection was lost, but it was mimicked by exogenous IL-10. Administration of IL-10 to isolated perfused hearts increased phosphorylation of the protein kinase Akt and limited infarct size after I-30/R-120. In wild-type mice, RIPC increased plasma and cardiac IL-10 protein levels and caused activation of Akt and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the heart at 24 h, which was also blocked by anti-IL-10 receptor antibodies. In the gastrocnemius muscle, RIPC resulted in immediate inactivation of the phosphatase PTEN and activation of Stat3, with increased IL-10 expression 24 h later. Myocyte-specific PTEN inactivation led to increased Stat3 phosphorylation and IL-10 protein expression in the gastrocnemius muscle. Taken together, these results suggest that RIPC induces late protection against myocardial IR injury by increasing expression of IL-10 in the remote muscle, followed by release of IL-10 into the circulation, and activation of protective signaling pathways in the heart. This study provides a scientific basis for the use of RIPC to confer systemic protection against IR injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,134
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#447
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,422
of 163,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.