| Title |
Effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on hepatocellular carcinoma in microcirculation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-013-0749-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peng Gong, Yingxin Wang, Yulin Wang, Shi Jin, Haifeng Luo, Jing Zhang, Haidong Bao, Zhongyu Wang |
| Abstract |
This study aims t explore the effect and application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on hepatocellular carcinoma in microcirculation by observing the angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma in transplanted area. BMSCs were isolated and cultured primarily using the method of whole bone marrow culture and identifying surface antigens of third-generation bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using flow cytometry. Hepatoma cells cultured with BMSCs-conditioned medium (BMSCs-CM) were assayed using the cell proliferation rate of the MTT method. Nude mice were divided into control group (group A), BMSCs cell transplantation group (group B), HepG-2 cell group (group C), and combined BMSCs and HepG-2 cell cotransplanted group (group D). The result showed that the microvascular density was not significantly different in groups A and B. However, the microvascular density at 14 days was higher than 0 day in group C (P < 0.05). In group D, the microvascular density at 14 days was higher than that of 7 and 0 days (P < 0.05) and 7 days was higher than 0 days (P < 0.05). It was showed that the microvascular density did not get significant difference at 0 and 7 days in the four groups (P > 0.05). But the microvascular density of group C was higher than groups A and B at 14 days (P < 0.05), group D was higher than groups A and B at 14 days (P < 0.05) and group D was higher than group C at 14 days (P < 0.05). BMSCs could promote the growth of microvascular in hepatoma cells in a transplanted area. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,686,611
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,219
of 2,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,878
of 198,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#29
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,621 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.