↓ Skip to main content

The feasibility of administration of activated charcoal with respect to current practice guidelines in emergency department patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Toxicology, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The feasibility of administration of activated charcoal with respect to current practice guidelines in emergency department patients
Published in
Journal of Medical Toxicology, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf03160918
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank LoVecchio, J. Shriki, K. Innes, J. Bermudez

Abstract

The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, European Association of Poisons Centres, and Clinical Toxicologists recommend administration of activated charcoal (AC) within one-hour of an acute toxic ingestion [1]. Our poison control center periodically and upon request faxes an abbreviated protocol to hospital emergency departments, reminding physicians of these current AC recommendations. This study was conducted to describe how often patients present within the one-hour time frame and how often the guidelines in the above position statement are being followed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 33%
Researcher 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,171,289
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#170
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,784
of 68,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them