↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and covariates of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hypertension, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and covariates of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial
Published in
Journal of Hypertension, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32836040a4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riitta L. Antikainen, Nigel Beckett, Ruth Peters, Robert Fagard, Chakravarthi Rajkumar, Jiguang Wang, Vassil Stoyanovsky, Daniel Barrowdale, Christopher J. Bulpitt

Abstract

To estimate the prevalence and covariates of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hypertension
#2,821
of 5,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,276
of 206,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hypertension
#32
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.