↓ Skip to main content

A microarray whole-genome gene expression dataset in a rat model of inflammatory corneal angiogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A microarray whole-genome gene expression dataset in a rat model of inflammatory corneal angiogenesis
Published in
Scientific Data, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2016.103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Mukwaya, Jessica M. Lindvall, Maria Xeroudaki, Beatrice Peebo, Zaheer Ali, Anton Lennikov, Lasse Dahl Ejby Jensen, Neil Lagali

Abstract

In angiogenesis with concurrent inflammation, many pathways are activated, some linked to VEGF and others largely VEGF-independent. Pathways involving inflammatory mediators, chemokines, and micro-RNAs may play important roles in maintaining a pro-angiogenic environment or mediating angiogenic regression. Here, we describe a gene expression dataset to facilitate exploration of pro-angiogenic, pro-inflammatory, and remodelling/normalization-associated genes during both an active capillary sprouting phase, and in the restoration of an avascular phenotype. The dataset was generated by microarray analysis of the whole transcriptome in a rat model of suture-induced inflammatory corneal neovascularisation. Regions of active capillary sprout growth or regression in the cornea were harvested and total RNA extracted from four biological replicates per group. High quality RNA was obtained for gene expression analysis using microarrays. Fold change of selected genes was validated by qPCR, and protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We provide a gene expression dataset that may be re-used to investigate corneal neovascularisation, and may also have implications in other contexts of inflammation-mediated angiogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Engineering 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,998,251
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#1,897
of 2,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,824
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.