↓ Skip to main content

Avoiding Complications in Bone and Soft Tissue Ablation

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Avoiding Complications in Bone and Soft Tissue Ablation
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00270-016-1487-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Nicholas Kurup, Grant D. Schmit, Jonathan M. Morris, Thomas D. Atwell, John J. Schmitz, Adam J. Weisbrod, David A. Woodrum, Patrick W. Eiken, Matthew R. Callstrom

Abstract

As with percutaneous ablation of tumors in the liver, lungs, and kidneys, ablation of bone and non-visceral soft tissue tumors carries risk, primarily from collateral damage to vital structures in proximity to the target tumor. Certain risks are of particular interest when ablating bone and non-visceral soft tissue tumors, namely neural or skin injury, bowel injury, fracture, and gas embolism from damaged applicators. Ablation of large volume tumors also carries special risk. Many techniques may be employed by the interventional radiologist to minimize complications when treating tumors in the musculoskeletal system. These methods include those to depict, displace, or monitor critical structures. Thus, measures to provide thermoprotection may be active, such as careful ablation applicator placement and use of various displacement techniques, as well as passive, including employment of direct temperature, radiographic, or neurophysiologic monitoring techniques. Cementoplasty should be considered in certain skeletal locations at risk of fracture. Patients treated with large volume tumors should be monitored for renal dysfunction and properly hydrated. Finally, ablation applicators should be cautiously placed in the constrained environment of intact bone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 20%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,971,231
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#493
of 2,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,159
of 319,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,734 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.