↓ Skip to main content

The mechanism of metal nanoparticle formation in plants: limits on accumulation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
The mechanism of metal nanoparticle formation in plants: limits on accumulation
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11051-008-9533-6
Authors

R. G. Haverkamp, A. T. Marshall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Latvia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 232 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 23%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Professor 9 4%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 59 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 20%
Chemistry 33 13%
Materials Science 18 7%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Engineering 13 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 70 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,393
of 91,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.