↓ Skip to main content

Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 2,810)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
104 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4380-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayuki Nagatomi, Tatsuo Mae, Teruyoshi Nagafuchi, Shin‐ichi Yamada, Koutatsu Nagai, Minoru Yoneda

Abstract

The shoulder manual resistance test is one of the common clinical assessments for patients with muscle weakness. However, there have been no studies investigating the threshold for muscle weakness. The purpose of this study was to clarify the threshold for muscle weakness in the shoulder manual muscle resistance test. Fifty-three patients (37.9 ± 20.6 years old) with either rotator cuff tear (21 patients), superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesion (7 patients), or Bankart lesion (25 patients) of one shoulder were administered three manual muscle resistance tests (abduction strength, external rotation, and belly press tests). Positive results in these tests were defined as a subjective weakness in the involved shoulder compared to the opposite shoulder. Based on this result, the patients were divided into positive and negative groups. Another observer measured isometric strength using a hand-held dynamometer and calculated the side-to-side ratio. Comparing instrument measurement with manual measurement, the cut-off point, at which we can recognise that there is a side-to-side difference, was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cases with less than 60% of the muscle strength in the contralateral shoulder were judged as positive in all examinations, whereas among the cases with 60-90% of muscle strength, there was a mixture of negative and positive determinations. The cut-off point was 78.9% in the abduction strength test, 73.8% in the external rotation test, and 84.0% in the belly press test. The side-to-side difference could be manually detected, when muscle strength was less than 75-85% of that on the contralateral side. This finding suggests that it is necessary to understand the limitation of these manual tests in the case of clinical examinations. Therefore, care must be taken for the shoulder manual muscle resistance test as muscle weakness cannot be fully detected by manual measurement. Case-control study, Level IV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 21%
Sports and Recreations 12 11%
Psychology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#583,627
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#29
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,504
of 423,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.