↓ Skip to main content

Novice-based data collection methods for the study of IOIS: practice probes and learning communities

Overview of attention for article published in Electronic Markets, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Novice-based data collection methods for the study of IOIS: practice probes and learning communities
Published in
Electronic Markets, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12525-013-0126-6
Authors

Kai Reimers, Robert B. Johnston, Xunhua Guo, Stefan Klein, Bin Xie, Mingzhi Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 12 50%
Computer Science 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,751,467
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Markets
#344
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,215
of 175,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Markets
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.