↓ Skip to main content

The targeted therapy revolution in neuroendocrine tumors: in search of biomarkers for patient selection and response evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The targeted therapy revolution in neuroendocrine tumors: in search of biomarkers for patient selection and response evaluation
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10555-013-9421-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara De Dosso, Enrique Grande, Jorge Barriuso, Daniel Castellano, Josep Tabernero, Jaume Capdevila

Abstract

The molecular events of tumorigenesis in neuroendocrine tumors are poorly understood. Understanding of the molecular alterations will lead to the identification of molecular markers, providing new targets for therapeutics. The purpose of this review was to critically analyze the genetic abnormalities in neuroendocrine tumors, with the aim of identifying biomarkers that indicate a response to agents developed against these targets and to serve as an understanding for the combinations of different active compounds. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 1/2 (EGFR and HER2), vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, and heat shock proteins are all interesting candidate biomarkers with involvement in carcinogenesis and tumor evolution of several neoplasms, including neuroendocrine tumors. Some of them have already been evaluated both as targets and also as biomarkers in clinical trials conducted in advanced neuroendocrine tumor settings, and others should encourage further investigations into innovative therapeutic opportunities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,190,878
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#736
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,570
of 175,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.