↓ Skip to main content

Nascent multicellular life and the emergence of individuality

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings: Plant Sciences, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Nascent multicellular life and the emergence of individuality
Published in
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12038-014-9420-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia De Monte, Paul B Rainey

Abstract

The evolution of multicellular organisms from unicellular ancestors involves a shift in the level at which selection operates. It is usual to think about this shift in terms of the emergence of traits that cause heritable differences in reproductive output at the level of nascent collectives. Defining these traits and the causes of their origin lies at the heart of understanding the evolution of multicellular life. In working toward a mechanistic, take-nothing-for-granted account, we begin by recognizing that the standard Lewontin formulation of properties necessary and sufficient for evolution by natural selection does not necessarily encompass Darwinian evolution in primitive collectives where parent-offspring relationships may have been poorly defined. This, we suggest, limits the ability to conceptualize and capture the earliest manifestations of Darwinian properties. By way of solution we propose a relaxed interpretation of Lewontin's conditions and present these in the form of a set of necessary requirements for evolution by natural selection based upon the establishment of genealogical connections between recurrences of collectives. With emphasis on genealogy - as opposed to reproduction - it is possible to conceive selection acting on collectives prior to any manifestation of heritable variance in fitness. Such possibility draws attention to the evolutionary emergence of traits that strengthen causal relationships between recurrences - traits likely to underpin the emergence of forms of multiplication that establish parent-offspring relationships. Application of this framework to collectives of marginal status, particularly those whose recurrence is not defined by genealogy, makes clear that change at the level of collectives need not arise from selection acting at the higher level. We conclude by outlining applicability of our framework to loosely defined collectives of cells, such as those comprising the slugs of social amoeba and microbes that constitute the human microbiome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
Portugal 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 66 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 30%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#242
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,853
of 239,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.