You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association Between Specific Adipose Tissue CD4+ T-Cell Populations and Insulin Resistance in Obese Individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastroenterology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Fabbrini, Marina Cella, Steve A. Mccartney, Anja Fuchs, Nada A. Abumrad, Terri A. Pietka, Zhouji Chen, Brian N. Finck, Dong Ho Han, Faidon Magkos, Caterina Conte, David Bradley, Gemma Fraterrigo, J. Christopher Eagon, Bruce W. Patterson, Marco Colonna, Samuel Klein |
| Abstract |
An increased number of macrophages in adipose tissue is associated with insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction in obese people. However, little is known about other immune cells in adipose tissue from obese people, and whether they contribute to insulin resistance. We investigated the characteristics of T cells in adipose tissue from metabolically abnormal insulin-resistant obese (MAO) subjects, metabolically normal insulin-sensitive obese (MNO) subjects, and lean subjects. Insulin sensitivity was determined by using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#10,029
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,266
of 209,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#89
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.