| Title |
Lack of Either Estrogen or Progesterone Receptor Expression Is Associated with Poor Survival Outcome among Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2772-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seho Park, Byeong-Woo Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Chang Wan Jeon, Han-Sung Kang, Jung-Eun Choi, Ki-Tae Hwang, In Cheol Kim |
| Abstract |
This study was designed to evaluate the impact of lack of either estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) on characteristics and outcomes among luminal A breast cancer subtype treated with endocrine with or without chemotherapeutic agents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,134
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,357
of 6,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,914
of 277,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#31
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.