You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris T. Amemiya, Jessica Alföldi, Alison P. Lee, Shaohua Fan, Hervé Philippe, Iain MacCallum, Ingo Braasch, Tereza Manousaki, Igor Schneider, Nicolas Rohner, Chris Organ, Domitille Chalopin, Jeramiah J. Smith, Mark Robinson, Rosemary A. Dorrington, Marco Gerdol, Bronwen Aken, Maria Assunta Biscotti, Marco Barucca, Denis Baurain, Aaron M. Berlin, Gregory L. Blatch, Francesco Buonocore, Thorsten Burmester, Michael S. Campbell, Adriana Canapa, John P. Cannon, Alan Christoffels, Gianluca De Moro, Adrienne L. Edkins, Lin Fan, Anna Maria Fausto, Nathalie Feiner, Mariko Forconi, Junaid Gamieldien, Sante Gnerre, Andreas Gnirke, Jared V. Goldstone, Wilfried Haerty, Mark E. Hahn, Uljana Hesse, Steve Hoffmann, Jeremy Johnson, Sibel I. Karchner, Shigehiro Kuraku, Marcia Lara, Joshua Z. Levin, Gary W. Litman, Evan Mauceli, Tsutomu Miyake, M. Gail Mueller, David R. Nelson, Anne Nitsche, Ettore Olmo, Tatsuya Ota, Alberto Pallavicini, Sumir Panji, Barbara Picone, Chris P. Ponting, Sonja J. Prohaska, Dariusz Przybylski, Nil Ratan Saha, Vydianathan Ravi, Filipe J. Ribeiro, Tatjana Sauka-Spengler, Giuseppe Scapigliati, Stephen M. J. Searle, Ted Sharpe, Oleg Simakov, Peter F. Stadler, John J. Stegeman, Kenta Sumiyama, Diana Tabbaa, Hakim Tafer, Jason Turner-Maier, Peter van Heusden, Simon White, Louise Williams, Mark Yandell, Henner Brinkmann, Jean-Nicolas Volff, Clifford J. Tabin, Neil Shubin, Manfred Schartl, David B. Jaffe, John H. Postlethwait, Byrappa Venkatesh, Federica Di Palma, Eric S. Lander, Axel Meyer, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 293 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 9% |
| Japan | 12 | 4% |
| France | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| South Africa | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 111 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 198 | 68% |
| Scientists | 75 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 2% |
| Canada | 12 | <1% |
| Japan | 8 | <1% |
| Brazil | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Sweden | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1112 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 275 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 244 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 148 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 134 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 71 | 6% |
| Other | 228 | 18% |
| Unknown | 140 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 703 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 192 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 95 | 8% |
| Unknown | 162 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 850. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,717
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,131
of 98,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99
of 210,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#8
of 1,018 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,018 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.