↓ Skip to main content

Human behaviour during and immediately following earthquake shaking: developing a methodological approach for analysing video footage

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Human behaviour during and immediately following earthquake shaking: developing a methodological approach for analysing video footage
Published in
Natural Hazards, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1967-4
Authors

Emily Lambie, Thomas M. Wilson, David M. Johnston, Steven Jensen, Erik Brogt, Emma E. H. Doyle, Michael K. Lindell, William S. Helton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 35%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 20%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Psychology 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#848
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,788
of 274,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#19
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.