↓ Skip to main content

Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4965 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1601 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Published in
Nature, October 1999
DOI 10.1038/44385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Sallusto, Danielle Lenig, Reinhold Förster, Martin Lipp, Antonio Lanzavecchia

Abstract

Naive T lymphocytes travel to T-cell areas of secondary lymphoid organs in search of antigen presented by dendritic cells. Once activated, they proliferate vigorously, generating effector cells that can migrate to B-cell areas or to inflamed tissues. A fraction of primed T lymphocytes persists as circulating memory cells that can confer protection and give, upon secondary challenge, a qualitatively different and quantitatively enhanced response. The nature of the cells that mediate the different facets of immunological memory remains unresolved. Here we show that expression of CCR7, a chemokine receptor that controls homing to secondary lymphoid organs, divides human memory T cells into two functionally distinct subsets. CCR7- memory cells express receptors for migration to inflamed tissues and display immediate effector function. In contrast, CCR7+ memory cells express lymph-node homing receptors and lack immediate effector function, but efficiently stimulate dendritic cells and differentiate into CCR7- effector cells upon secondary stimulation. The CCR7+ and CCR7- T cells, which we have named central memory (TCM) and effector memory (TEM), differentiate in a step-wise fashion from naive T cells, persist for years after immunization and allow a division of labour in the memory response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Other 15 <1%
Unknown 1547 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 413 26%
Researcher 281 18%
Student > Master 204 13%
Student > Bachelor 132 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 93 6%
Other 208 13%
Unknown 270 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 417 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 377 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 259 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 168 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 <1%
Other 77 5%
Unknown 288 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,676,414
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#40,098
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#896
of 36,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#36
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.