↓ Skip to main content

Clinicians Can Accurately Assign Apgar Scores to Video Recordings of Simulated Neonatal Resuscitations

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinicians Can Accurately Assign Apgar Scores to Video Recordings of Simulated Neonatal Resuscitations
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, August 2010
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e3181dcfb22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Izhak Nadler, Helen G. Liley, Penelope M. Sanderson

Abstract

The Apgar score is used to describe the clinical condition of newborns. However, clinicians show low reliability when assigning Apgar scores to video recordings of actual neonatal resuscitations. Simulators provide a controlled environment for recreating and recording resuscitations. Clinicians assigned Apgar scores to such recordings to test the representativeness of simulator and recordings. Study design was guided by Brunswik's probabilistic functionalism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Engineering 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,881,763
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#914
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,356
of 104,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.