↓ Skip to main content

Improved adjuvanting of seasonal influenza vaccines: Preclinical studies of MVA‐NP+M1 coadministration with inactivated influenza vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Immunology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved adjuvanting of seasonal influenza vaccines: Preclinical studies of MVA‐NP+M1 coadministration with inactivated influenza vaccine
Published in
European Journal of Immunology, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/eji.201242922
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin E. Mullarkey, Amy Boyd, Arjan van Laarhoven, Eric A. Lefevre, B. Veronica Carr, Massimiliano Baratelli, Eleonora Molesti, Nigel J. Temperton, Colin Butter, Bryan Charleston, Teresa Lambe, Sarah C. Gilbert

Abstract

Licensed seasonal influenza vaccines induce antibody (Ab) responses against influenza hemagglutinin (HA) that are limited in their ability to protect against different strains of influenza. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognizing the conserved internal nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix protein (M1) are capable of mediating a cross-subtype immune response against influenza. Modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus encoding NP and M1 (MVA-NP+M1) is designed to boost preexisting T-cell responses in adults in order to elicit a cross-protective immune response. We examined the coadministration of HA protein formulations and candidate MVA-NP+M1 influenza vaccines in murine, avian, and swine models. Ab responses postimmunization were measured by ELISA and pseudotype neutralization assays. Here, we demonstrate that MVA-NP+M1 can act as an adjuvant enhancing Ab responses to HA while simultaneously inducing potent T-cell responses to conserved internal Ags. We show that this regimen leads to the induction of cytophilic Ab isotypes that are capable of inhibiting hemagglutination and in the context of H5 exhibit cross-clade neutralization. The simultaneous induction of T cells and Ab responses has the potential to improve seasonal vaccine performance and could be employed in pandemic situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#16,158,378
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Immunology
#5,708
of 6,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,140
of 201,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Immunology
#36
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.