↓ Skip to main content

Validation of High-Sensitivity Troponin I in a 2-Hour Diagnostic Strategy to Assess 30-Day Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of High-Sensitivity Troponin I in a 2-Hour Diagnostic Strategy to Assess 30-Day Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome
Published in
JACC, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Cullen, Christian Mueller, William A. Parsonage, Karin Wildi, Jaimi H. Greenslade, Raphael Twerenbold, Sally Aldous, Bernadette Meller, Jillian R. Tate, Tobias Reichlin, Christopher J. Hammett, Christa Zellweger, Jacobus P.J. Ungerer, Maria Rubini Gimenez, Richard Troughton, Karsten Murray, Anthony F.T. Brown, Mira Mueller, Peter George, Tamina Mosimann, Dylan F. Flaws, Miriam Reiter, Arvin Lamanna, Philip Haaf, Christopher J. Pemberton, A. Mark Richards, Kevin Chu, Christopher M. Reid, William Frank Peacock, Allan S. Jaffe, Christopher Florkowski, Joanne M. Deely, Martin Than

Abstract

The study objective was to validate a new high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) assay in a clinical protocol for assessing patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 247 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Other 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 74 29%
Unknown 49 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 61 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,642,359
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,741
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,983
of 212,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#30
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.