↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pediatric thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: a meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct), November 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.07.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Stevens, Justin K.P. Lee, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Geoffrey K. Blair

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence in the current literature regarding the use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy in the diagnosis of a thyroid nodule in the pediatric population. There are numerous studies that look at the sensitivity and specificity of this test with varying results. A meta-analysis will provide further insight into this topic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 28%
Other 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,786,744
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#391
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,751
of 108,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Science Direct)
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.