| Title |
Psychiatric admissions from crisis resolution teams in Norway: a prospective multicentre study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Hasselberg, Rolf W Gråwe, Sonia Johnson, Jūratė Šaltytė-Benth, Torleif Ruud |
| Abstract |
Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide intensive alternative care to hospital admission for patients with mental health crises. The aims of this study were to describe the proportions and characteristics of patients admitted to in-patient wards from CRTs, to identify any differences in admission practices between CRTs, and to identify predictors of admissions from CRTs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Egypt | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 28% |
| Psychology | 20 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#12,682,373
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,561
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,580
of 197,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#49
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.