| Title |
Comparison of 18F-FACBC and 11C-choline PET/CT in patients with radically treated prostate cancer and biochemical relapse: preliminary results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-013-2373-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Nanni, Riccardo Schiavina, Stefano Boschi, Valentina Ambrosini, Cinzia Pettinato, Eugenio Brunocilla, Giuseppe Martorana, Stefano Fanti |
| Abstract |
We assessed the rate of detection rate of recurrent prostate cancer by PET/CT using anti-3-(18)F-FACBC, a new synthetic amino acid, in comparison to that using (11)C-choline as part of an ongoing prospective single-centre study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 48% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,380,827
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#361
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,616
of 199,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.